ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) have become a key tool in the adaptation of these drugs to the health system. The information available on the application and indicators used in these programs in emergency departments is scarce. The objective of this study is to know the extent of ASP implementation in the emergency departments, as well as the use of antimicrobials in these units. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study. An invitation was sent to all participants of the REDFASTER-SEFH emergency pharmacist working group. A questionnaire was used consisting of 21 items, answered by a team made up of a pharmacist, emergency room specialist, infectious disease specialist and microbiologist. RESULTS: Eighteen hospitals completed the survey. Fourteen (77.8%) had an ASP manager. The DDD value per 1000 admissions ranged between 36.5 and 400.5 (median: 100.4 [IQR:57.2-157.3]). Both carbapenem and macrolide group presented wide variability in use. Six (33.3%) hospitals had an annual report on the specific resistance profile for urine and blood cultures. The percentage of multi-drug resistant strains in urine cultures was 12.5% and in blood cultures 12.2%. The percentage of adequacy in the bacteremia treatment was 81.0% (IQR:74.6-85.0%), while in urinary tract infections was 78.0% (IQR:71.5-88.0). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the existence of ASP members in emergency services, as well as the training activity and local guidelines is common. knowledge of the use of antimicrobials and resistances is limited. Future activities must be aimed at improving information about the ASP results in these units.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , HospitalsABSTRACT
La Listeria continúa siendo una posible etiología de meningitis bacteriana en nuestro medio, siendo causa más frecuente en neonatos, ancianos o pacientes inmunodeprimidos. Debido a la gravedad y la mortalidad asociada, resulta de gran interés disponer de nuevas herramientas que permitan un manejo clínico y farmacológico más eficaz.Presentamos un caso de meningitis por Listeria que ingresa en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. Dada la escasa penetración de la gentamicina en el sistema nervioso central y siendo ésta uno de los tratamientos de elección en las guías clínicas de referencia, se decide la administración de gentamicina intraventricular llevando a cabo una monitorización de concentraciones de gentamicina en líquido cefalorraquídeo (LCR).Debido a la alta variabilidad farmacocinética del paciente crítico, la monitorización de concentraciones en LCR de gentamicina tras su administración intraventricular puede resultar de gran utilidad para asegurar el alcance de concentraciones de fármaco que permitan una mayor eficacia del tratamiento. (AU)
Listeria is currently a possible etiology of bacterial meningitis in our society, being one more frequent cause in neonates, elderly or immunosuppressed patients. Due to the severity and mortality associated, it is therefore very useful to have new tools that allow a more effective clinical and pharmacological management.We present a case of Listeria meningitis admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. Given the low penetration of gentamicin into the central nervous system and being one of the treatments of choice in the clinical reference guidelines, the administration of intraventricular gentamicin was decided by monitoring the concentrations of gentamicin in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).Due to the high pharmacokinetic variability of the critically ill patient, monitoring CSF concentrations of gentamicin after intraventricular administration can be very useful to ensure the achievement of drug concentrations that allow greater treatment efficacy. (AU)
